Challenges of Differentiated Instruction and Ways to Overcome Them in Primary Education

Authors

  • Tamar Shinjiashvili Sokhumi State University
  • Lia Akhaladze Sokhumi State University
  • David Zurabashvili Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/sou.2023.21.40

Keywords:

Differentiated Teaching, Pedagogical Challenges, Individualization of Teaching, Diverse Learning Resources, Teacher Professional Development

Abstract

Based on the research conducted by the authors, this paper explores the cha­llenges of differentiated instruction in primary school classrooms. The theoretical framework of the study is built on successful educational practices related to the issue and relies on foreign, predominantly English-language materials, which formed the basis for analyzing the research results. Target group of the study: primary school teachers. Research methods: interview and observation.

      The study identified a number of problems. The findings revealed that for teachers, differentiation is a difficult process due to the time and resources required. It involves planning, preparing, and delivering multiple options and materials for different stu­dents. Managing classroom logistics and coordinating differentiated activities and asse­s­sments can also be challenging. Furthermore, differentiated instruction requires kno­w­ledge and skills in curriculum design, instructional strategies, assessment methods, and consideration of student diversity. Educators may also face resistance or skepticism to­ward traditional assumptions and practices, as well as toward the attitudes and beliefs of both teachers and students. Another challenge lies in balancing the expectations and demands of various stakeholders, including students, parents, colleagues, and school administration.

      Ways to Overcome the Challenges. According to the authors, successful imple­me­n­tation of differentiation in primary education requires teachers to have a well-defined vision, adopt a flexible approach, and foster a culture of collaboration. The following re­commendations are proposed: teachers should begin working on differentiation by analyzing learning goals and standards and then use them as the foundation for adju­sting content, process, product, and learning environment according to students’ needs. This creates an appropriate environment for learners. Teachers should assess students’ needs and preferences through different methods and resources, plan differentiated in­s­tr­uction, and adapt it to individual requirements. In addition, students should be pro­vi­­ded with multiple options and support in various formats, modes, levels, and resou­r­ces to meet their preferences. It is essential for teachers to provide clear instructions and feedback so that students can properly guide their own expectations.

     In the authors’ view, differentiation in primary school is a complex but crucial pro­cess for effective teaching and learning. To achieve this, teachers should ensure effe­c­tive classroom organization, create flexible groups, and carefully plan the differ­re­n­tia­tion process. Establishing clear routines, rules, and roles, and - most importantly - enga­ging in continuous professional growth and development will support teachers in over­co­ming the existing challenges.

References

ბოჭორიშვილი, მ. (2024). დიფერენცირებული სწავლება – თანამედროვე საგანმანათლებლო პარადიგმა. მასწავლებელი. https://mastsavlebeli.ge/?p=39241

ხუნძაყიშვილი, მ., & ბივერი, ს. (2018). განმავითარებელი შეფასება და დიფერენცირებული სწავლება.

ყანჩელი, ნ., & ჭოხონელიძე, ნ. (2023). Modern challenges of differentiated teaching. International Journal of Innovative Education, 2(1), 45-52. https://sci-space.com/pdf/modern-challenges-of-differetiated-teaching-282ve0g8.pdf

ბაგრატიონი-გრუზინსკი, მ. ტყეშელაშვილი, შ. ქურციკიძე, ლ. (2021). ინკლუზიური განათლების გზამკვლევი: ინდივიდუალური სასწავლო გეგმა. თბილისი: განათლების განვითარების ცენტრი. http://inclusion.ge/res/docs/202109-0400193979992.pdf

Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), F

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. pp.15-36

Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. pp. 7-12;

Heacox, D. (2012). Making differentiation a habit: How to ensure success in academically diverse classrooms (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing. pp. 45-49; 88-105;

Hughes, J. N. (2014). Teacher–student relationships and school adjustment: Progress and remaining challenges. Attachment & Human Development, 16(3), 271–279.;

Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strateg ies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 34–62;

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing. pp. 1–35; 36–85; 86–140;

Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2009). The application of differentiated instruction in postsecondary environments: Benefits, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 307–323;

Smit, R., & Humpert, W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in small schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1152–1162;

Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), 935–947;

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD. pp. 1–35; 70–108;

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD. pp. 1–40; 85–130;

Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. pp. 15–65; 100–145;

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 79–91 (ZPD), 97–104;

Westwood, P. (2018). What teachers need to know about differentiated instruction. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press. pp. 5–42; 80–115;

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. pp. 13–35; 85–125;

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD. pp. 1–45;145–200

Published

2025-09-02

Issue

Section

Education Scientific